АкушерствоАнатомияАнестезиологияВакцинопрофилактикаВалеологияВетеринарияГигиенаЗаболеванияИммунологияКардиологияНеврологияНефрологияОнкологияОториноларингологияОфтальмологияПаразитологияПедиатрияПервая помощьПсихиатрияПульмонологияРеанимацияРевматологияСтоматологияТерапияТоксикологияТравматологияУрологияФармакологияФармацевтикаФизиотерапияФтизиатрияХирургияЭндокринологияЭпидемиология

THE RECOVERY PROCESS

This is a cyclic affair with periods of 12, 24, 36, 60, 72, and 84 hours, weeks, and other multiples of 12 hours, 3 week, and 3 months until recovery is completed through the reverse repetition of the symptoms of the pre-growth toxic period in which functional block suppresses oxidation-favoring develop­ment of fermentation with its displacement of oxidation. For this, one dose or two of either the Oxidation or Reducing Reagent is all that is generally used.Dur­ing this recovery period, the symptoms of action of the pathogen’s toxin during the development of the disease are repeated in reverse order to their coming. These the writer showed, as early as 1927 (7) to be neurological, vascular, or digestive disturbances, and represent different phases of the polymerization of the toxin from a monomeric form of the acute infection on through various molecular weights, until it has reached the structure able to produce a neoplastic response. During the recovery, the process is reversed as the polymer is oxidatively broken down peeling off its accumulated monomer units and passing through stages where it produced the various symptoms of the pre-growth period. Head­aches, dizziness, epilepsy, diabetes, psoriasis, arthritic changes, etc. may be the changes that reappear for a short time and then disappear. Usually the last reac­tion is an acute inflammatory process at a point where the patient had experi­enced a severe infection many years earlier. In breast cases, it is usually the tonsil and associated lymphatics on the same side as the affected breast, but it may be a scar somewhere else where a severe infection was present. This reaction gen­erally comes right after the growths are absorbed, or when only the supporting fibrous tissue for the neoplastic cells remains. This absorbs much slower or may become calcified and absorb still slower. Many biopsies have demonstrated this fact.

This reaction may come in the appendix even where the pathogenesis concerned the breast, and was not a tumor, but instead a neuritis. For example in my early experience, a woman of about fifty had her left breast removed because the celebrated surgeon diagnosed cancer behind the nipple. The symptoms were sharp shooting pains. After the breast was healed and she returned for her first inspection, she had the same sharp pains in the right breast nipple and the same surgeon insisted on removing that breast that very day, but because of social engagements, he consented to let her wait till after a large dinner party, scheduled for the following day in Detroit. Instead, her husband brought her to me for examination, and I could find no tumor, whatsoever, but the pains were the exact pictures of the Homeopathic Berberis symptomatology. She said the left breast felt exactly the same, and was now frightened into having the right breast removed. I gave her Berberis and the pains were gone in a few days, never to return. The breast was never removed either. A recent different “Berberis case” came to Rio for diagnosis, because her Arizona surgeon wanted to remove the left breast for the same type of sharp pains. My examination found no tumor, whatsoever, and as she was so emaciated with the skin stretched over the ribs, so that any tumor would easily have been observed. The axillary glands were palpable as they would be in such a state of emaciation. Examination revealed a chronic appendicitis over to the left of the midline and tenderness below the umbilicus. She was advised that her great reaction would occur in that position. She was so weak it was difficult to walk and carry her purse. It took a year after the SSR injection for the pains to completely disappear and to gain strength, when suddenly on the 60th week she came down with an “acute appendix attack.” On removal the appendix, it was found to be attached firmly to the left ovary and kinked. Her health quickly returned. Had the appendix been cultured, the germs would have possibly been found to have been non-pathogenic at that time, as was observed in other instances.

This recurrence of the reaction cleaning out the lesion that harbored the original infection (as a last feature of the recovery process) also occurs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and many neurological and psychiatric problems, and in diabetes. It teaches much that the profession is eager to know. The complete text gives examples such as fill the insane asylums, but would be simple problems to clear up, if this etiological factor and the pathogenesis described here were common knowledge.

Дата добавления: 2015-07-23 | Просмотры: 531 | Нарушение авторских прав